11 User(s) làđọc chủ đề này 30 phút vừa qua
0Thành viên11 Khách
0Thành viên11 Khách
Что интересно прямо сейчас
Setting up port forwarding in ro... (25 пользователи)
$200 HEROFEST 1v1 TOURNAMENT by ... (23 пользователи)
ratings (21 пользователи)
Word Association (18 пользователи)
#ReviveCS - Proposal (17 пользователи)
TIW 2020 Map votes (10 пользователи)
Unknown Enemy TD - Updated Map (8 пользователи)
Самые активные темы за последнюю неделю:
why you banned me (8 посты)
Out-of-Sync error every game of ... (5 посты)
Issues with AKA System (4 посты)
Resolution issues (2 посты)
Problema con ventana de actualiz... (2 посты)
Unable to see game timer in mult... (2 посты)
error "port restricter cone... (2 посты)
What exactly is your problem with a vote?
If you wan't a tournament where you dictate every rule, then i suggest you go host one. A vote is the only fair way to do it here.
dont answer anymore pls bcoz i wont
making live vetos forces everyone to be ready for every situation with really not thinking time, which forces you to be ready before the match set up starts (as i said before)
They also have a limited roster unlike our case, they cannot entirely switch out their players for every other match.
Honestly, the only real reason for you insisting on this can be, that you try to get an advantage by picking weird and unusual civcombinations and not allowing the opponent time to create a gameplan. And you talk about making it competitive... Trying to get cheap wins?
Oh and i understand the 1hr rule, clans with 100+ members needs time to manage the players and decide who plays what, play few practice game and watch some records if there is time left, fine.
Oh and i understand the 1hr rule, clans with 100+ members needs time to manage the players and decide who plays what, play few practice game and watch some records if there is time left, fine.
That is how RB plans to knock out xCs into the Silver League.